|
The three lobsters awaiting their fate |
Standing on the rocks that have been
placed along the coastline to stop sea erosion one could see far into the
southern sea. It is November 17, 2011
and I’m standing on one of these rocks looking out at the Indian Ocean. Silhouetted against the horizon and scattered
over a Persian carpet textured sea are a number of outrigger catamarans. At this early hour the color of the sea is gunmetal
blue. It is 6.30 am and I’m in a place called
Ginthota located on the outskirts of Galle town with a French film crew from
France 5 television channel. We are
waiting for the fishermen to return from the sea to film them and their
catch. An hour later, all the catamarans
as if they are heeding a hidden command all head back at the same time to the
headland. From a hardly discernible
speck in the distance—where one could barely see them move—suddenly each
catamaran becomes a speeding wave rider cresting over breaking waves racing to
the beach.
|
An outrigger catamaran out at sea |
|
Waiting for the fishing boats to return |
|
An outrigger speeding back to the headland |
As the boats land they are hauled all
the way up the beach out of reach of the waves and immediately the fishermen
and their families begin the process of sorting the day’s catch. While the film crew occupied themselves
filming this traditional way of life that was probably thousands of years old—I
was observing how the fishermen were sorting their catch—fish of commercial
value ended back in the boat and everything else that had no value was thrown on the ground. As the fishermen continued
sorting I began to wonder what would consist the bigger pile—the commercially
valuable fish or the by catch? In a
short time it looked as if a wave has left a shoal of fish stranded on the
beach.
|
Sorting the catch |
|
None commercial value fish were thrown on the beach |
I could not connect this waste
with a traditional lifestyle—how could such waste of life support a lifestyle
that was so old? There is something about the glaring eye and gasping mouth of
a dying fish suffocating on land that is impossible to forget or to walk away
from. On many occasions, I have put
aside whatever “other important” things I had to do at the time, to gather fish
that were still alive and had been discarded by fishermen as by catch to throw
them back to the sea.
|
A repast for crows and other carrion eaters |
|
Wasteful Death |
|
The glass eyed stare of a fish that has suffocated |
|
"By catch" reflects the wastefulness of the fishing industry |
|
A crow flying off with a discarded crab |
When you consider
that this happens throughout the coast of Sri Lanka where hundreds of thousands
of peoples livelihood is subsistence fishing, the magnitude and scale of the by
catch issue becomes mind boggling. At
Kalpitiya I have seen entire stretches of the beach littered with by catch. There were so many fish spread along the
beach that even the carrion eaters had given up!
|
A boat at Kalpitiya filled to the gunwales with Sea Jack caught using the illegal "leila" netting system |
|
Thousands of small fish being discarded as by catch at a fish landing beach at Kalpitiya |
|
So many fish littered the beach at Kalpitiya the carrion eaters could not cope with it |
|
An environmental problem of epic proportions |
|
The look of death! |
As the film crew moved on to other boats,
I walked up to the one that they had been filming. I greeted the fishermen and walked around
their boat looking at all the various fish that had been caught.
|
Observing an age old traditional lifestyle |
A baby shark
that was still alive, a few deadly looking barracudas (Sphyraena sp.) known
locally as Jeelawa, glittering silver-colored fish of various kinds flashing
iridescent hues on tin foil textured skins, globs of mauve colored squid and
then in a hole dug in the sand I saw the catch of the day—lobsters!
|
The Catch of the Day! |
Since lobsters are robust and can live off
water for a considerable amount of time they are kept alive by putting them in
a pit dug in the sand. This ensures that
they are alive and fresh when the buyers come to purchase them. There were six of them two were gravid females
with their underbellies packed with thousands of probably even a million bright orange-colored eggs—the
future generation! One would assume, putting
these two gravid female lobsters back into the sea as soon as they were caught
would be the most common sense thing to do, since they ensure the
sustainability of the livelihoods of these fishermen. While they do adhere to a government imposed
ban on catching lobsters during the general breeding season—gravid females
caught off the breeding season are not protected and can be sold. The more sensible regulation would be to ban
the catching or selling of gravid female lobsters at anytime. Three of the lobsters was so small they could
have passed for large prawns!
|
Destroying the future: gravid female lobsters can be caught off the breeding season |
Over the years I have found myself in
this situation many times—basically appealing or bargaining to release or
acquire some unfortunate animal or animals that had been caught to be eaten or
kept as pets. Sometimes I feel like a
hostage negotiator—with the exception that the parties I deal with most times—like
these fishermen—our also hostages in a sense.
They are marginalized people tied to a lifestyle where they barely eke
out a living. Like hostages they too have
very few life choices in regard to their fate.
In a rapidly changing world they see their traditional ways of living been
pushed out by the so called march of “progress.” I appealed to the fishermen to release the
baby shark and the three small lobsters back to the sea. To my relief they agreed to do this. A young fisherman carried the shark by its
tail and released it to the sea. I and another older fisherman did the
same with the three small lobsters.
|
The young fisherman with the baby shark prior to releasing it |
|
Releasing the baby shark |
|
One of the three very small lobsters that were put back |
|
Taking one of the small lobsters back to the sea |
|
A chance to live another day |
Now
began the more serious negotiations—bargaining for the three large
lobsters. For about 30 minutes I haggled
with the fishermen the purchase price of the three lobsters. The reason it took so long to make a deal is
because generally a fishing expedition constitutes a coalition of fishermen;
the boat owner plus another 3 or 4 fishermen.
The boat owner provides the boat, outboard engine and fuel and the others
provide the fishing equipment and labor.
The value of the catch is divided according to a pre-arranged percentage
scale with the boat owner getting a major portion of the income. So I have to appeal to, or bargain with the
entire coalition, or if he is present, then with the boat owner since he gets
the lion’s share of the catch. Finally,
we strike a bargain! I pay Rs 5,000 for the three lobsters, which is comparable
to their current market value. .
|
Negotiating the price of life |
|
The gravid females had more market value
|
|
Sold to the Moron with the sunglasses over there who sees them as cute characters from "Little Mermaid!" |
Now the question was where to release
them? Putting them back into the sea by
that beach would be a wasted effort. I suddenly remembered Somadasa, a dive master
who had a dive shop at Hikkaduwa. I got
to know Somadasa or Somé as he was popularly known—when we were conducting post
tsunami ecological assessments of all the protected areas located along the southern coast
in 2005 and 2006. Somé is a respected local
environmental activist. He was the first
person in Hikkaduwa to organize the clearing of tsunami debris from the coral
reef soon after the devastating tsunami of 2004. He was also one of the first people in Sri
Lanka who had successfully replanted coral. This was in response to 80% of the Hikkaduwa coral reef dying due to bleaching. It seems the coral reefs at Hikkaduwa were the ideal place to release the
three lobsters, since it was a marine sanctuary where fishing was
prohibited.
|
The successful coral replanting project of Somé's |
Suddenly thinking of Somé brought
recollections of how we saved a green sea turtle nest from poachers in 2006,
when we were conducting the post tsunami ecological assessments in
Hikkaduwa. It happened quite by
accident. Sanjayan and Genevieve, two
friends from the Nature Conservancy based in the USA who were assisting us with
the ecological assessments were jogging with me on the beach at 5.30 am when we
came across the nest. We saw the patted
down sand and the two sets of turtle tracks leading to and from the nest. Apparently the turtle had just laid the eggs
and gone back to the sea. We called Somé
immediately and told him about it. He
asked us to wait by the nest until he came and not to leave it alone even for
one second. We understood why because
already there were several egg poachers and feral dogs hovering around to raid
the nest. With Somé’s help we dug the
eggs out and transferred them to a sea turtle hatchery nearby. Hikkaduwa used to me a major turtle nesting beach but today due to the extensive development along the beach very few turtles come ashore to nest. When we unearthed the nest to transfer the eggs to the hatchery it drew quite a crowd of onlookers since it is a rare occurrence now to see a nesting turtle or its nest. The sea turtles’ that nests
along the Kalpitiya coastline are going to face a similar situation, when all
the major tourism development efforts planned for the area gets underway.
|
Jogging early in the morning at Hikkaduwa turned out to be a sea turtle saving effort |
|
Digging up the green turtle nest before predators and poachers go to it |
|
Feral dogs are one of the biggest threats to sea turtle eggs and hatchlings |
|
The eggs waiting transfer to an official turtle hatchery established nearby |
|
The eggs attracted a fair number of onlookers |
In regard to the three lobsters, I phoned
Somé immediately and apprised him of the situation. He asked me to bring the three lobsters as
soon as possible to the Coral Gardens Hotel where he operated his dive
shop. Fortunately, the distance from
Galle to Hikkaduwa was less than 20 minutes.
I asked one of the fishermen to pack the three lobsters into a cardboard box. He diligently did so by first putting a thick
layer of sand and then packing the three lobsters on top of it. As soon as they were packed and ready to go Sampath
and I raced off to Hikkaduwa in the Defender.
|
Getting ready to pack the three lobsters |
|
Packed and ready to go |
When I arrived at the hotel, Somé had arranged a young diver to take the
three lobsters to the reef to release them.
It was good to meet up with Somé since the last time we saw each other
was way back in 2006. While we watched from the beach, the
young diver waded to the reef to release the lobsters carrying the box on his
head. When he returned after releasing
them, he said, the male lobster had shot of like a rocket as soon as he let it
go underwater, where as the two females had moved much slowly probably due to
their gravid situation. It was a happy
reunion for Somé and me, with the additional satisfaction of having saved the
lives of some unfortunate animals that faced certain death.
|
Somé checking out the lobsters |
|
Discussing with a local fisherman a potential release point |
|
Heading out to the release point |
|
The young diver wading to the reef to release the lobsters |
|
Discussing current marine conservation issues |
|
The diver releasing the lobsters by the reef |
Over tea it was good to catch up with what
has been going on since we last saw each other, as well as to reminisce over
past events. As mentioned earlier Somé
was one of the first people in Sri Lanka who had successfully replanted
coral. At the time we met in 2005, he was
facing obstructions from the Department of Wildlife Conservation and from a
well known professor of marine biology at the Colombo University to continue
his coral replanting efforts. I tried to
help him by meeting the professor, whom I knew to clear matters and get his
support. To my disappointment the professor,
purely because of personal reasons and ego was adamant not to allow Somé to
continue with his coral replanting project.
It was an enlightening experience as well as a clear example of some of the
real challenges that conservationists face, which the public rarely gets to
know—which is, trying to do conservation while appeasing the ego of petty
bureaucrats, self appointed experts and environmental gurus.
This brings to mind another similar
experience I underwent recently. Myself
and a fellow conservationist—coincidentally also named Ravi (I assure that this
is not a tale of two Ravi’s), submitted a proposal to the Department of
Wildlife Conservation to map all the elephant corridors. The objective was to create a map that
clearly showed all the elephant corridors that were used by elephants to range
between protected areas. While these
corridors are crucial for the ranging of elephants they have no official
designation or protection. Therefore
they are vulnerable to encroachment from squatters, slash and burn agriculture,
settlements and other development programs. Habitat loss is
a serious threat to wildlife especially to large and highly mobile animals like
elephants that require substantial areas to live. When they lose habitat elephants tend to
range for food elsewhere, which results in conflicts with humans. Ensuring
the survival of a ‘flagship’ species like the Sri Lankan elephant requires the
protection of the entire landscape, which automatically benefits other wildlife
that relies on the same landscape for their survival.
The objective of the Elephant Corridor
Mapping (ECM) project (as we named it) was to address the issue of the lack of and access to elephant
distribution and ranging information which hampers the efforts to safeguard
areas essential for elephants. Been a small island, space constraints preclude affording the
25,000 – 35,000 km2 required to sustain the estimated 5000 - 7000
elephants. The only alternative is to adopt innovative land use policies and
strategies that allow people and elephants to share the existing land. To achieve this level of co-existence it is
critical to identify the areas that are essential for elephants especially
outside the protected area network and make this information available to
development agencies, government officials and to the general public. An effective way to provide this information
would be to create a map identifying all the areas where elephants are
distributed and the corridors they use for their annual ranging. At the same time these corridors could be
identified on the ground using specific markers. Protecting the corridors will help to reduce
human elephant conflicts tremendously. The
map can be made available to the general public via Google maps API.
|
Elephant Corridor Map would be similar to this map showing elephant death data due to HEC |
We
met with the current Director of Operations, who was then the acting Director General
of the Department of Wildlife Conservation to discuss the details of the
project and to get the Department’s consent.
Funds for the entire project we would raise with the Department only
having to give its’ consent and support. When we gave the details of the project to the
acting Director General, he was all excited about it. He especially remarked how the ECM would be extremely
helpful to the Department in their efforts to erect electric fences to mitigate
HEC and to provide protection to elephant corridors. However to our surprise he asked us to submit
the project proposal to the Research Committee of the Department. This dysfunctional and completely useless research
committee consists of experts appointed from various academic and scientific institutions
whose primary function was to say no to research. So not surprisingly, the research committee led
by a self proclaiming environmental guru told the Wildlife Department not to support
the ECM project. The tragedy here is not
the self proclaiming environment guru’s illiterate, egoistical and vindictive behavior. But the fact that, the officials of the
Department of Wildlife Conservation are so unqualified for the posts they hold,
that they cannot take an educated unilateral or independent decision when it comes to
supporting a project that they themselves can obviously see as been beneficial
to their own efforts. To hide their professional
shortcomings the officials of the department hide behind the so called “research
committee” which is equally illiterate.
This situation has created a negative feedback cycle that is hard to break now. As a result, over the years, this trend has turned
the Department of Wildlife Conservation into one of the most ineffectual scientific
institutions in the country unfortunately to the detriment of our beleaguered wildlife.
If the animals could speak Latin, I’m
sure they would say, "Ave, DWC, morituri
te salutant!" (We who are about to die salute you). And if the DWC
knew Latin (more unlikely than the animals knowing Latin) they would probably
reply, "Avete vos" (Fare you well).
|
"Ave, DWC, morituri te salutant!" (We who are about to die salute you)
|
Great story and sad that government officials make such "informed" decisions.
ReplyDeleteAgree with Hashish. Janaka Mudalige
ReplyDeleteSalute you for releasing those lobsters and attempting to save by catch fish. Thank you Sir for your efforts. Heart breaking and blood boiling to know how the government functions with regard to wildlife and nature matters. Wonder how this can be solved.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, sorry to hear about the mapping project issues. What is the next step?
ReplyDelete